culturebriefs
8:49in productionCh. 1 · Not a sneaker company/ 8:49 · ceiling 15 min
Fashion · Society

New Balance

William J. Riley · 1906

New Balance wasn’t born in sport—it was born in the foot.

New Balance is a footwear company whose origin lies in biomechanical correction—not sport. Its founding premise was specific, functional, and local. Its later expansion into performance and lifestyle markets introduced contradictions it failed to reconcile—most visibly in its 2012 toning-shoe settlement. It matters now because it shows how medical authority gets repackaged as consumer identity—and how easily that packaging outlives its justification.

FashionSocietyAdvertisingBrandingFashionAdvertising across the network →
Chapters & takeaways4
  1. 0:56
    Not a sneaker company

    New Balance started as a Boston-area arch support company—not a shoe brand.

  2. 2:09
    The chicken that built the brand

    Riley copied the chicken’s foot to make a three-point support system.

  3. 3:19
    How it moved off the shelf

    The Trackster spread through YMCA programs and college cross-country teams—not retail or celebrity.

  4. 4:31
    When balance became fiction

    New Balance paid $2.3 million in 2012 to settle false claims about toning shoes.

Worth your time?

Yes. Study the whole thing.

3.5/ 5
What works
  • as a case study in product-led branding
  • as a cautionary example of health-washing
What does not
  • culture/arts
  • culture/ideas
  • culture/movements-and-scenes
Study it if
  • designers
  • marketing professionals
  • consumers of wellness products
Skip it if
  • athletes seeking performance data
  • historians of sport
  • collectors of vintage sneakers
The written brief1 min read

What the thing is

New Balance began as the New Balance Arch Support Company in 1906. It was a medical-adjacent hardware firm, not a sportswear brand.

Where it came from

William J. Riley, an Irish immigrant, founded it in the Boston area to manufacture arch supports and fit accessories.

What it gets right

It solved a real biomechanical problem: uneven weight distribution in shoes. Riley’s three-point arch support directly addressed balance, not aesthetics or status.

What it gets wrong

It claimed toning benefits for its footwear without evidence—settling a false advertising lawsuit in 2012 for $2.3 million.

Why it matters now

It reveals how consumer health claims migrate from clinical tools to mass-market fashion—and how easily they detach from evidence.

Is it worth your time

Yes—if you care about how orthopaedic pragmatism shaped athletic footwear, not hype.

Same beat · Fashion4 of 113
11:00
CosplayCosplay is a materially grounded, globally dispersed performance practice rooted in two separate histories—one in US sci-fi fandom, one in Japanese anime culture. Its significance lies in how it turns representation into labour, and character into conduct.
8:18
Grunge (fashion)1980Grunge fashion was an anti-fashion statement rooted in mid-1980s Seattle’s music scene. It used durable, thrift-store clothing worn loosely and androgynously—especially flannel shirts and Doc Martens—to reject 1980s flash. Kurt Cobain’s blend of lumberjack workwear and vintage feminine dresses helped define it. By the mid-1990s, it had been commodified globally—most notably by Marc Jacobs for Perry Ellis in 1993. Its legacy is not authenticity, but the speed with which resistance becomes product.
8:50
GyaruGyaru is a Japanese fashion subculture rooted in the transliteration of 'gal'. It emerged as nonconformist resistance to traditional Japanese gender roles and beauty standards—particularly the expectation that women be housewives with pale skin and dark hair. Early associations included juvenile delinquency and frivolousness among teenage girls. Kogal culture, a defining variant, rose prominently in the Heisei era (1989–2019), peaking in the 1990s and early 2000s. It is currently experiencing a revival in the Reiwa era. The subculture includes a male counterpart, gyaruo. Its core visual ingredients are consistently cited as gaudy fashion, extreme makeup, and dyed hair.
10:21
Levi Strauss & Co.Levi Strauss · 1853Levi Strauss & Co. is a pragmatic infrastructure project disguised as clothing. It began as immigrant commerce, not craft. Its innovations were patents, lot numbers, trademarks — administrative tools that made reproducible, durable workwear. It did not define youth culture, nor did it seek cultural status. It solved problems for people who needed pants to last — and kept doing so, even when the problem changed.
Up next in Culture

New Hollywood

· 9:10

New Hollywood didn’t reinvent cinema — it re-routed authority from studios to directors, and turned realism into a grammar.

Play nextBack to Fashion
9:10