culturebriefs
8:52in productionCh. 1 · Launched in print/ 8:52 · ceiling 15 min
Movements & scenes · Ideas

Futurism

1909

Futurism wasn’t about the future—it was about breaking the present with a petrol-soaked rag.

Futurism was an Italian avant-garde movement launched in Milan in 1909 by Filippo Tommaso Marinetti through the Manifesto of Futurism, first published on 5 February 1909 in La gazzetta dell'Emilia and republished in Le Figaro on 20 February 1909. It originated in Italy in the early 20th century. Italian Futurism effectively ended with the outbreak of the Great War. Futurism as a coherent and organized artistic movement is regarded as extinct since 1944, following Marinetti's death.

Movements & scenesIdeasAvant-gardeThe First World WarThe interwar yearsAvant-garde across the network →
Chapters & takeaways4
  1. 0:52
    Launched in print

    Futurism began as a press stunt—not a studio practice.

  2. 1:57
    Rooted in Milan

    It was Italian, Milanese, and deliberately provincial in its origins.

  3. 3:26
    Over before 1914

    It collapsed before the Great War—not during it.

  4. 4:46
    Extinct by 1944

    It died with Marinetti—not with fascism, not with Italy’s defeat.

Worth your time?

Yes. Study the whole thing.

3.5/ 5
What works
  • Manifesto of Futurism (1909)
What does not
  • fascism
  • art-deco
  • cubism
  • dada
Study it if
  • media-theorists
  • design-historians
  • political-communicators
Skip it if
  • art-collectors
  • museum-curators-of-painting
The written brief1 min read

What the thing is

Futurism was a short-lived Italian avant-garde movement. It was a set of declarations, not a stable practice. It prioritised provocation over production.

Where it came from

It began in Milan in 1909. Filippo Tommaso Marinetti published the Manifesto of Futurism on 5 February 1909 in La gazzetta dell’Emilia. It reappeared in Le Figaro on 20 February 1909.

What it gets right

It names the sensory shock of industrial modernity: the roar of cars, the glare of streetlights, the fracture of static form. It treats technology not as background but as protagonist.

What it gets wrong

It confuses acceleration with progress. It glorifies war as hygiene. It mistakes destruction for renewal. It excludes women except as muses or mothers—despite claiming to reject tradition.

Why it matters now

It is the first movement to treat media attention as an end in itself. Its tactics—staged outrage, timed releases, celebrity-as-weapon—prefigure digital virality without its infrastructure.

Is it worth your time

Yes—if you want to understand how manifestos weaponise speed, noise and violence as cultural tools. No—if you expect coherent aesthetics or lasting artistic practice.

Same beat · Movements & scenes4 of 139
9:24
Adbusters1989Adbusters is a Canadian anti-capitalist activist foundation founded in 1989 in Vancouver by Kalle Lasn and Bill Schmalz. It uses culture jamming—especially subvertisements and campaigns like Buy Nothing Day and Occupy Wall Street—to challenge consumerism and corporate control of information flows. It publishes the reader-supported, advertising-free Adbusters magazine. Its founding premise is that citizens lack equal access to information flows compared to corporations.
8:14
Crypto-anarchyCrypto-anarchy is a movement, not a prophecy. It uses cryptography to enable anonymity, free speech and trade. It emerged from Timothy C. May’s 1988 manifesto and the 1992 cypherpunk founding. It gets right that code can constrain power—but wrong that it will collapse the state. A 2022 study confirms its political irrelevance—yet its architecture remains vital for Internet-native dissent.
8:35
Culture jammingCulture jamming is anti-consumerist protest that uses détournement to subvert corporate media forms. It began in the 1950s, was named in 1984 by Don Joyce of Negativland, and draws directly from the Letterist and Situationist Internationals. It correctly identifies media as a tool of perception-shaping and conformity-enforcement. But it wrongly assumes irony alone can resist power—and ignores how quickly its tactics are absorbed into branding. It matters now because corporate language has colonised every channel of attention, yet its methods remain stuck in the logic of the 1980s media landscape. It is worth your time if you want to understand why resistance so often looks like the thing it opposes.
8:55
Free software movementThe free software movement is a precise, principled refusal of proprietary control over software. It began in 1983 with GNU and institutionalised in 1985 with the FSF. It gets right that software freedom must be guaranteed—not merely permitted. It gets wrong that licence compliance alone secures user agency. Its relevance has grown as software becomes infrastructural—but its methods remain rooted in individual refusal and collective development.
Up next in Culture

Gado-gado

· 9:54

A national dish that refuses to settle on where it’s from—or whether it’s even rice-free.

Play nextBack to Movements & scenes
9:54