culturebriefs
10:02in productionCh. 1 · What kind of thing is it?/ 10:02 · ceiling 15 min
Movements & scenes · Ideas

Afrofuturism

Afrofuturism isn’t about Black people in space—it’s about Black people defining what space means.

Afrofuturism names a constellation of practices—not a genre, not a movement, not a style. It is defined by who it centres (the African diaspora), how it works (through technoculture and speculation), and what it demands (liberation, not just visibility). Its strength is conceptual precision. Its weakness is institutional invisibility: no gatekeepers, no syllabi, no archive named in the material. It matters because it refuses to let Black futures be an afterthought.

Movements & scenesIdeasRaceSpecial effectsWorldbuildingRace across the network →
Chapters & takeaways5
  1. 1:03
    What kind of thing is it?

    It is three things at once: aesthetic, philosophy of science, and history.

  2. 2:23
    Where did the name come from?

    A term coined in 1993—not a movement that began then.

  3. 3:29
    What does it demand of the future?

    Its core definitions tie technology and imagination directly to liberation and Black cultural lensing.

  4. 4:50
    How does it handle time?

    It refuses linear time—insisting on backward thinking alongside forward thinking.

  5. 5:51
    What holds it together?

    It is explicitly fluid and malleable—no canon, no orthodoxy, no fixed boundaries.

Worth your time?

Yes. Study the whole thing.

4/ 5
What works
  • Ytasha L. Womack's Afrofuturism: The World of Black Sci-Fi and Fantasy Culture
  • Ingrid LaFleur's writing on Black cultural futurism
  • Bennett Capers' 2019 work on temporality and Black thriving
What does not
  • define a movement
  • describe a historical period
  • name a school of art
  • refer to a single medium
Study it if
  • Black creators seeking intellectual scaffolding
  • educators building anti-assimilationist curricula
  • critics tired of treating Black imagination as ornament
Skip it if
  • readers seeking definitive origins
  • those looking for a unified artistic doctrine
  • anyone expecting consensus on boundaries
The written brief1 min read

What the thing is

Afrofuturism is a cultural aesthetic, philosophy of science, and history. It explores the intersection of African diaspora culture with science and technology. It addresses diasporic themes through technoculture and speculative fiction.

Where it came from

The term was coined by American cultural critic Mark Dery in 1993. It was explored in the late 1990s through conversations led by Alondra Nelson.

What it gets right

It names a practice of future-building rooted in Afro-diasporic experience. It insists on liberation as structural, not symbolic. It holds past and present as active forces in speculative work.

What it gets wrong

It risks flattening divergent practices under one label. It offers no internal criteria for inclusion. It says nothing about audience, access, or gatekeeping.

Why it matters now

Because it provides a named tradition for Black creators working across media to claim futurity without assimilation. Because its definitions foreground liberation—not just representation—as non-negotiable.

Is it worth your time

Yes—if you need frameworks that centre Black imagination as method, not metaphor.

Same beat · Movements & scenes4 of 139
9:24
Adbusters1989Adbusters is a Canadian anti-capitalist activist foundation founded in 1989 in Vancouver by Kalle Lasn and Bill Schmalz. It uses culture jamming—especially subvertisements and campaigns like Buy Nothing Day and Occupy Wall Street—to challenge consumerism and corporate control of information flows. It publishes the reader-supported, advertising-free Adbusters magazine. Its founding premise is that citizens lack equal access to information flows compared to corporations.
8:14
Crypto-anarchyCrypto-anarchy is a movement, not a prophecy. It uses cryptography to enable anonymity, free speech and trade. It emerged from Timothy C. May’s 1988 manifesto and the 1992 cypherpunk founding. It gets right that code can constrain power—but wrong that it will collapse the state. A 2022 study confirms its political irrelevance—yet its architecture remains vital for Internet-native dissent.
8:35
Culture jammingCulture jamming is anti-consumerist protest that uses détournement to subvert corporate media forms. It began in the 1950s, was named in 1984 by Don Joyce of Negativland, and draws directly from the Letterist and Situationist Internationals. It correctly identifies media as a tool of perception-shaping and conformity-enforcement. But it wrongly assumes irony alone can resist power—and ignores how quickly its tactics are absorbed into branding. It matters now because corporate language has colonised every channel of attention, yet its methods remain stuck in the logic of the 1980s media landscape. It is worth your time if you want to understand why resistance so often looks like the thing it opposes.
8:55
Free software movementThe free software movement is a precise, principled refusal of proprietary control over software. It began in 1983 with GNU and institutionalised in 1985 with the FSF. It gets right that software freedom must be guaranteed—not merely permitted. It gets wrong that licence compliance alone secures user agency. Its relevance has grown as software becomes infrastructural—but its methods remain rooted in individual refusal and collective development.
Up next in Culture

Anomie

· 8:43

Anomie isn’t about losing your way—it’s about being given the wrong map.

Play nextBack to Movements & scenes
8:43