What the thing is
The lipstick effect is a hypothesis: that consumers buy more low-cost luxuries during economic crises.
Where it came from
Leonard Lauder publicized it in 2008, citing a post-2001 rise in his company’s lipstick sales after the terrorist attacks.
What it gets right
It identifies a real human tendency: small indulgences persist, or even spike, during hardship.
What it gets wrong
It misattributes causation. The 2001 lipstick sales rise was tied to celebrity cosmetics — not crisis psychology. Later recessions show lipstick sales falling with income, not rising.
Why it matters now
It persists as shorthand for resilience and consumer irrationality — despite being empirically contradicted and stripped of explanatory power.
Is it worth your time
No. It is a debunked economic trope masquerading as insight.

