Saved
Ideas · Society

Veblen good

Price isn’t a barrier to desire—it’s the signal that tells people what to want.

Worth your time?4/5Yes.Study the whole thing.What works, what does not, who it is for ↓
9:22in productionCh. 1 · The Upward Curve/ 9:22 · ceiling 15 min
5 chapters · 9:22Ceiling 15:00

The brief is written and checked. The video joins this page when it is cut.5 chapters · 2 min read · 9:22 planned

Read the brief

The Veblen good is not about taste—it’s about visibility. It names a mechanism: price as credential. It works where status is legible, transferable, and publicly consumed. It fails where buyers care only about function—or where the signal decays into parody. Its endurance lies not in empirical perfection, but in its precision as a lens on aspiration-driven markets.

Chapters & takeaways5
  1. 0:52
    The Upward Curve

    Demand rises with price—breaking the law of demand.

  2. 2:25
    Two Names, One Idea

    Veblen named the behaviour in 1899; Leibenstein named the effect in 1950.

  3. 3:41
    The Price Cut Trap

    Cutting the price can backfire—demand spikes then collapses.

  4. 4:49
    Hard to Test, Harder to Dismiss

    Human dishonesty undermines testing—but brain scans from 2007 support the core idea.

  5. 6:13
    Anomaly, Not Aberration

    It sits among anomalies—not exceptions—in microeconomic theory.

2 more chaptersFewer chapters
Worth your time?

Yes. Study the whole thing.

4/ 5
What works
  • Veblen_good
What does not
  • influence
  • popularity
  • retrospective-consensus
Study it if
  • economists
  • marketers
  • designers
Skip it if
  • general-readers-seeking-entertainment
Who should study it, and who should skipHide who it is for
The written brief2 min read

What the thing is

A Veblen good is a luxury item whose demand increases as its price rises—violating standard microeconomic demand theory.

The higher price may make such goods desirable as a status symbol in conspicuous consumption and conspicuous leisure, and that a product may be a Veblen good because it is a positional good, something few others can own.

Where it came from

Thorstein Veblen introduced conspicuous consumption in 1899; Harvey Leibenstein formalised the ‘Veblen effect’ in 1950.

Veblen identified conspicuous consumption as a mode of status-seeking, in the sense of keeping up with the Joneses, in The Theory of the Leisure Class. Colin Campbell questioned whether the theory could be tested, because research participants are not completely honest, while research in 2007 on the effect of social comparison on human brains can be read as evidence for Veblen. Fred Hirsch later discussed status-seeking as an incentive to spend. Leibenstein defined the Veblen effect in a 1950 article titled “Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand”, and there is disagreement over whether the theory applies only to luxury goods or to all goods.

What it gets right

It correctly identifies that some goods gain desirability when priced higher—because buyers use price as a proxy for exclusivity and social proof.

Concepts that explain Veblen goods include pecuniary emulation, which leads to invidious comparison, and the relative consumption trap. The theory contributed significantly to marketing and advertising. The effect also belongs to a family of anomalies that includes the snob effect, where demand among higher earners is inversely related to demand among lower earners, and the belief that a low price signals compromised quality.

What it gets wrong

It assumes demand rises monotonically with price, but the document shows lowering price may initially raise demand—contradicting a simple upward-sloping curve.

Lowering the price may increase demand at first, but quantity demanded will decrease afterwards. A counter-Veblen effect also exists, where preference rises as price falls because some consumers practise conspicuous thrift, and the Veblen effect differs from Giffen goods, where demand rises with price through the interplay of income and substitution effects rather than through any link between price and preference.

Why it matters now

It explains pricing strategies in luxury fashion, tech, and NFTs—where perceived scarcity and social signalling override utility.

Veblen goods are more affordable for high-income households, and affluent societies are usually the targeted groups of Veblen brands, which have been experiencing a trend away from conspicuous consumption. Ethical concerns include wastefulness as deadweight loss, a conspicuous display of unequal wealth, possible changes to optimal tax formulas and added pollution. Veblen goods aimed at ethical consumers must also be ethically manufactured to raise the quantity demanded.

Is it worth your time

Yes—if you want to understand how status reshapes markets, not just psychology.

Same beat · Ideas4 of 282
8:03
The Engineering of Consent1947The Engineering of Consent is a theory and practice developed by Edward Bernays, first articulated in a 1947 essay and expanded in a 1955 book, defining public relations as a scientific, engineering-like discipline grounded in social science research and aimed at shaping public attitudes through strategic use of communication channels, themes tied to conscious and subconscious motives, and influence via group leaders; it emerged from Freudian psychoanalytic concepts applied to consumer behavior and was institutionalised through academic publishing and professional practice.
10:25
Quantified selfQuantified self is a cultural phenomenon and community centred on self-knowledge through numbers. The term was proposed in San Francisco by Gary Wolf and Kevin Kelly in 2007. Roots go back to 1970s wearable computing and 2002 quantimetric self-sensing proposals. It treats the self as an object of empirical study. It conflates correlation with causation. It assumes numbers are neutral when they encode assumptions about health, productivity and normalcy. It displaces qualitative understanding with linear regression. It shaped how millions interpret bodily signals, habit and mood—long before wearables became mass-market. Its logic now underpins employer wellness programmes, mental health apps and algorithmic diagnostics.
10:26
Lipstick effectThe lipstick effect is a discredited economic hypothesis that mistook celebrity-driven cosmetics sales for psychological resilience. It fails empirical tests, lacks predictive utility, and obscures more plausible drivers like marketing and cultural timing.
9:41
Organizational cultureOrganisational culture is a diagnostic concept rooted in mid-century industrial observation—not a management tool. Its modern usage overstates employee alignment and underplays its origins in empirical social study. It matters because it shapes economic outcomes—but only if treated as behaviour, not belief.
Up next in Culture

Therapy speak

· 9:21

Therapy speak doesn’t help people understand themselves—it replaces precision with performance.

9:21