culturebriefs
9:53in productionCh. 1 · What it is/ 9:53 · ceiling 15 min
Ideas · Movements & scenes

Transhumanism

1980

Transhumanism isn’t about the future—it’s about who gets to define human limits now.

Transhumanism is an intellectual and cultural movement advocating human enhancement via technology.

IdeasMovements & scenesArtificial intelligenceConsciousnessEthicsArtificial intelligence across the network →
Chapters & takeaways4
  1. 0:56
    What it is

    Transhumanism is not sci-fi fantasy—it’s a defined movement with a specific goal: using technology to extend human cognition, health, longevity, and well-being.

  2. 2:14
    Where it came from

    It began with Huxley in 1957, took shape through FM-2030 and Max More, and coalesced institutionally in the early 1980s at UCLA.

  3. 3:58
    How it spread

    The Extropy Institute used conferences and a mailing list to spread transhumanist ideas during the rise of cyberculture.

  4. 5:35
    How it institutionalised

    The World Transhumanist Association (1998) formalised transhumanism as a subject for science and policy—then rebranded as Humanity+ in 2008.

Worth your time?

Yes. Study the whole thing.

4/ 5
What works
  • names a real problem
  • traces a clear institutional lineage
  • exposes the gap between philosophical ambition and democratic accountability
What does not
  • groundbreaking
  • seminal
  • iconic
  • timeless
Study it if
  • readers tracking the roots of tech policy
  • critics of techno-optimism
  • historians of 1980s intellectual life
Skip it if
  • those seeking practical self-enhancement advice
  • fans of speculative fiction without grounding in real institutions
The written brief1 min read

What the thing is

Transhumanism is an intellectual and cultural movement advocating human enhancement via technology.

Where it came from

It originated with Julian Huxley’s 1957 essay. Its contemporary form emerged through FM-2030 and Max More in the late 20th century. The first self-described transhumanists met formally in the early 1980s at UCLA.

What it gets right

It names a real tension: human biology is not fixed. It correctly locates enhancement as a continuum—not just radical posthumanism, but better cognition, longer healthspans, and disease resistance via NBIC tools.

What it gets wrong

It assumes technological inevitability. It offers no mechanism for democratic control, equity, or cultural pluralism—and treats ‘enhancement’ as universally desirable rather than historically contested.

Why it matters now

Because its core questions—Who controls enhancement? Who benefits? What counts as human well-being?—now shape real-world regulation of AI, gene editing, brain-computer interfaces, and longevity biotech.

Is it worth your time

Yes—if you want to understand how a fringe academic cluster at UCLA in the early 1980s became the conceptual engine for today’s AI ethics debates, longevity startups, and neurotech policy frameworks.

Same beat · Ideas4 of 212
8:14
Crypto-anarchyCrypto-anarchy is a movement, not a prophecy. It uses cryptography to enable anonymity, free speech and trade. It emerged from Timothy C. May’s 1988 manifesto and the 1992 cypherpunk founding. It gets right that code can constrain power—but wrong that it will collapse the state. A 2022 study confirms its political irrelevance—yet its architecture remains vital for Internet-native dissent.
8:55
Free software movementThe free software movement is a precise, principled refusal of proprietary control over software. It began in 1983 with GNU and institutionalised in 1985 with the FSF. It gets right that software freedom must be guaranteed—not merely permitted. It gets wrong that licence compliance alone secures user agency. Its relevance has grown as software becomes infrastructural—but its methods remain rooted in individual refusal and collective development.
8:42
AbsurdismAbsurdism names the friction between human meaning-making and cosmic silence. It does not resolve it. It insists on the tension. It is precise, unsparing, and useless as advice.
9:02
AccelerationismAccelerationism is a theory that uses capitalism’s own mechanisms to dismantle it. It emerged from Deleuze and Guattari’s 1970s work, was amplified by Nick Land’s CCRU in the 1990s, and named by Benjamin Noys in 2010. It correctly identifies internal contradictions in capitalism—but wrongly assumes those forces can be steered without reproducing domination. Its influence lives less in movements than in how technocrats, AI ethicists and climate strategists talk about scale and speed. It is worth your time only if you want to dissect that assumption—and see where it breaks.
Up next in Culture

Turkish coffee

· 8:36

Turkish coffee is not a drink—it’s a refusal of filtration, both literal and cultural.

Play nextBack to Ideas
8:36